Electrification is moving fast. Industry is switching from gas to power, logistics is electrifying fleets, and data centers are expanding at pace. For many organizations, electricity is no longer just a utility cost, but a core production factor.
Yet our electricity system is struggling to keep up. Grid congestion, connection delays and volatile prices are no longer future risks; they are operational realities that already influence investment decisions and growth ambitions. If electrification is to remain an enabler of economic growth, the constraints in our electricity system need to be addressed more deliberately. What is still missing today is a clear coordinated strategy.
Flexibility as a system enabler
Electrification does not solely increase electricity demand; it concentrates it in specific places and at specific times. At the same time, renewable energy is less predictable, making it increasingly difficult to match supply and demand during peak periods. Without flexibility, this imbalance inevitably leads to congestion, delays and rising system costs.
Flexibility refers to the ability to shift consumption, production or storage in response to system conditions. It offers a way to unlock capacity in the short to medium term, without having to wait a decade for grid reinforcement. Despite this, flexibility is still too often treated as a regulatory topic or confined to isolated pilot projects, rather than approached as a strategic lever.
That is a missed opportunity. Regulation will follow, but too slowly to resolve today’s bottlenecks. Organizations that depend on reliable power should already be asking themselves where demand can be shifted without impacting operations, which assets can actively respond to system stress, and how flexibility can become economically attractive rather than merely technically feasible. Without clear answers, electrification risks becoming a constraint rather than a growth engine.
Batteries alone won’t fix our problem
Batteries are rolling out at scale, and rightly so. They are fast and increasingly affordable storage systems, which are crucial to flexibility. But expecting batteries alone to solve system-wide challenges is wishful thinking.
As long as battery operators primarily follow short-term price signals, their behavior will not automatically align with system needs. Today’s incentives reward arbitrage rather than long-term reliability or local congestion relief. In practice, this creates three structural mismatches:
- Storage assets tend to be developed where margins are highest, rather than where grid capacity is most constrained.
- Flexibility assets start to compete instead of reinforcing each other, fragmenting system value.
- Overall system costs continue to rise despite heavy investment, as local congestion and reliability challenges remain unresolved.
This is not a technology problem, but a design problem. Assets are being added, but a more resilient system is lacking. Treating batteries as a silver bullet distracts from the underlying issue: flexibility needs to be valued and incentivized for its contribution to the system as a whole.
A portfolio of flexibility solutions across sectors
A truly flexible energy system cannot rely on a single solution. It requires a portfolio of flexibility options across sectors. Energy hubs provide a promising model, particularly in industrial zones, logistics clusters and urban environments.
Within these hubs, different forms of flexibility can be combined, such as industrial processes that can temporarily ramp down or up, thermal storage in buildings and district heating networks, electric vehicle fleets that charge intelligently, and data centers that can shift workloads. By integrating electricity, heat, storage and alternative energy carriers, energy can be shifted across both time and form.
Many of these assets already exist, but they sit outside the traditional energy domain and remain underutilized for system optimization. Unlocking their full value requires collaboration between energy companies, industry, logistics providers and the built environment.
From electrification to orchestrating execution
Electrification is essential. But without a deliberate and integrated flexibility strategy, it will increasingly run into physical and economic limits. The core risk is not a lack of technology, but a lack of coordination and strategic intent.
Executives should move beyond the question of whether flexibility is needed and focus instead on how it can be embedded into operational and investment decisions today. At Argon and Co, we believe that by developing a cross-industry strategy together, we can turn flexibility into a solution that is not resulting in more costs, but in real value. We have extensive experience in ensuring feasible transformations in complex supply chains with many suppliers, clients and network operators and would like to help find your optimal flexibility strategy.
Share:
