Supply Chain Design Series, Part 1 (visit part 2, here)
Top-performing organizations don’t wait for disruption to rethink their supply chains. Instead, they embed evaluation into the cadence of their operations. For them, supply chain design isn’t an initiative — it’s an always-on capability.
Until recently, there have been 2 types of triggers for supply chain and operations leaders to initiate a supply chain design initiative – event based triggers and periodic triggers.
Knowing when to revisit your own design starts by understanding the triggers that typically drive change.
These triggers emerge from operational pain points or strategic shifts. Some of the most common include:
A majority of companies tend to revisit their supply chain design as part of a 3 – 5-year cycle, or only after a major disruption occurs. This can certainly help uncover the shifts in supply and demand dynamics that impact cost and service outcomes, but much more can be done to safeguard against performance and value erosion.
Continuous or ongoing supply chain design analysis maximizes value and keeps supply chains better aligned with their business while allowing them to evolve with the rapid pace of change being realized every day.
Whether triggered by an event or revisited on a schedule, the ultimate goal of redesign is to build a supply chain that’s aligned with today’s reality — and prepared for tomorrow’s uncertainty.
The organizations that excel in this space aren’t reactive, rather they’re proactive, strategic, and committed to continuous network design as a source of competitive advantage for their business.
Reach out here if we can help you become a catalyst for positive change in your organization.
This is part 1 of a series, visit part 2, From Periodic to Proactive: Why Continuous Supply Chain Design Delivers More Value, Faster.